Conventions for Naming
Not that this is a particuliarly important discussion, but ...
Is there a logic behind the naming of different bot versions in an upgrade? For example, what makes a robot become 2.0 versus 1.2? Is there an actual standard somewhere?
And is a robot's version based on software? Hardware? Either/Or?
That's all. Go.



@ Sat, 2009-02-28 01:23
Nearly Beta!
@ Sat, 2009-02-28 16:53
I usually stop before it is
@ Sat, 2009-02-28 01:25
I suffer that problem too,
@ Sat, 2009-02-28 01:03
I do the same.
If you look at SplatBot MkII compared to the original, there were fairly major changes. Pictomatix MkII was borderline since it was only the camera that changed.
If I do a minor change in a robot I would just add an update at the bottom. Admittedly with a big long term project like BoozeBot I might use the decimal point system like CTC has done with Walter and only change to MkII if I did a major overhaul.
If I've made a software revision and posted the software then I'll usually just change a decimal point.
@ Sat, 2009-02-28 00:38
Walter...
@ Fri, 2009-02-27 21:52
ya for me its software version
@ Fri, 2009-02-27 21:41
Typically adding .1 means a
Typically adding .1 means a small revistion was made. This includes bug fixes, changes to color, etc minor stuff. Changing from version 1 to 2 usually means a large change was made. This is how I name software anyway. When people name their own bots they make it up. This is the "standard" that Microsoft and other software companies use. It isn't an official standard but a common practice.
@ Fri, 2009-02-27 21:07
no system